Yes if your modality is licensed, and the duty comes from your state board, not from HIPAA: Washington tells a massage therapist to document every session (WAC 246-830-565, 2021), and Massachusetts sets five items for a relaxation session (269 CMR 5.03, 2025). Outside licensing no board rule reaches you, and what the note holds is your call. Neither case asks for anything that reads like a hospital chart. Here is what belongs in it, and what does not.
Do massage therapists have to keep notes at all?
In both states we read, a licensed massage therapist must document, and the duty comes from the board — not from HIPAA, and not from billing. Requirements differ from state to state, so your own board's rule is the one that decides. If your modality sits outside licensing, no board rule reaches you, and the answer moves to your association and your own reasons.
The loudest answers online contradict each other: one calls a massage therapist's notes "your medical notes", another says therapists probably need no detailed notes because they are not medical personnel. Both skip the text that settles it. Washington's rule says a massage therapist "must document services provided", in a form "appropriate to the venue, the type and complexity of those services" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021), and the regulator's FAQ adds that this holds "regardless of the practice setting", chair massage included (Washington State Department of Health, FAQ, retrieved 2026).
Massachusetts lands elsewhere, and from a different starting point: its rule sets no blanket per-session duty. After a relaxation session it asks for five things — "their own name, the name of the client, the date and time of the session, any contraindications, and the client's Informed Consent for treatment" — and for chair massage at public events "No documentation is required", minors excepted (269 CMR 5.03, 2025). Same profession, two states, opposite answers about the same chair. So the honest sentence is "it depends on your state", and the place to look is your board's rule, then your association.
| Washington | Massachusetts | |
|---|---|---|
| The per-session minimum | Every session: client details, health history updated each session, date and duration, techniques applied, areas of the body worked, written consent (WAC 246-830-565, 2021) | For a relaxation session: practitioner's name, client's name, date and time, contraindications, informed consent (269 CMR 5.03, 2025) |
| Chair massage at a public event | Must be documented, "regardless of the practice setting" (Washington State Department of Health, FAQ, retrieved 2026) | "No documentation is required", unless the client is a minor (269 CMR 5.03, 2025) |
| When the clinical items switch on | "where the focus is on treating a health condition" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021) | "If a written plan of treatment is requested or required" (269 CMR 5.03, 2025) |
| Time to write it | Within 24 hours (WAC 246-830-565, 2021) | Within 24 hours, when a plan is in play (269 CMR 5.03, 2025) |
| SOAP required? | No — "Therapists are not required to do SOAP notes under this rule" (Washington State Department of Health, FAQ, retrieved 2026) | No format is named for relaxation work (269 CMR 5.03, 2025) |
Billing is not the trigger. Australia's Association of Massage Therapists calls it "a common misconception" that records are only needed for remedial work "claimable for a health fund rebate" (AMT, 2023); Washington's rule sets no billing condition at all (WAC 246-830-565, 2021). Retention periods exist and differ — Washington asks for three years from the last session (WAC 246-830-570, 2021) — and they get a separate piece.
If your modality is not licensed, the chapter does not reach you. Massachusetts leaves "the Feldenkrais Method; Reflexology; The Trager Approach", Shiatsu, Qi Gong and Reiki outside its massage licence when they are practised within a profession that has its own standards and ethics, and says those services must not be called massage (M.G.L. c. 112, § 228); Washington's chapter "does not apply to" graduates of an approved somatic education program (RCW 18.108.050, 2017). Outside the chapter, the chapter's documentation rule does not set your answer — that is all it means, and none of this is legal advice. For coaches, the ICF Code of Ethics is about handling rather than content: records kept "in a manner that promotes confidentiality, security, and privacy" (ICF Code of Ethics, 2026), with what goes into them left to the coach (ICF ethics guidance, 2026).
What is the note for when you are not in a clinic?
To remember. Consent and what happened are the part a board may ask for; the memory of the person is the part that makes the next session better, and the part nobody else asks for.
Association guidance frames the record as defence — the Canadian CMMOTA calls the client record "your best defense" (CMMOTA, 2025). Fair enough for its members. It also explains why so many notes read like reports for a reader who never arrives.
I write mine for a different reader. Nobody has ever asked for my notes — no board, no association, no insurer, because I work outside all three — and I keep them anyway. I want to remember the session, and through that to sense more finely the people who come to me. The note is where I go back in: into my own sensations, the client's, the session's.
That is also why the note is not tied to the hour after the session. An idea arrives in the middle of the day — something the client could do in ordinary life to get where they want to go, an exercise made for them, a short guided meditation for before the next session so they arrive already settled into a sensation — and it goes into the same place. In every checklist I have read, the note is the record of an event that has happened. Mine is also where the next session starts.
The two purposes sit together. If your state sets a minimum, that is the floor — consent, date, what you did and where — and above it the note is yours.
What earns its place in the note?
What your board lists, if you have one, and then what you will want back before the next session — how the conversation went, what stood out, what surprised you, what was hard, what you guessed, and what you wanted to do and did not.
Start with the floor, if you have one. Washington's per-session list runs: client details, age, health history enough to spot "cautions or contraindications" and updated at each session, date and duration, techniques and modalities applied, areas of the body worked, and written informed consent, "valid for one year unless revoked", plus separate consents for sensitive areas and any change in draping (WAC 246-830-565, 2021). Massachusetts, for relaxation work, stops at its five items (269 CMR 5.03, 2025). On neither list: symptoms, findings, a plan, or a format — Washington's regulator says therapists "may, depending on the type of massage, use simple fill-in-the-blank, check-box, or circle options" (Washington State Department of Health, FAQ, retrieved 2026).
Then the layer nobody requires. Mine goes in as a brain dump: dictation on, and whatever comes out, comes out. There is no filter at the door, on purpose — the material gets structured afterwards, and if something should go, it goes then, on reading the structured version.
It is like clay; you can pull a surprising amount out of it later. What usually comes out:
- How the first conversation went. What the person said they wanted, close to their own words.
- What stood out. The moments that caught your attention before you knew why.
- How the preparation went, and how the session went. The feel of it, not a protocol.
- Surprises and difficulties. Both are where the next session comes from.
- Hunches. Where the session was heading before the client got sleepy or ran out of energy; what to check next time.
- What you wanted to do and did not. And why, if you know. Clinical formats have no field for this.
- And whatever else stayed with you. A smell, a song that was playing, something said at the door on the way out. The list is what recurs in mine, not a set of fields.
These layers arrive mixed — observation, hunch and plan in one breath — and separating them is a job for later; a structuring step will do it if asked, and often the shape is already right. Clinical formats ask the opposite: separate fields, and selection in the moment. Both work. The difference is when you filter.
After a first meeting the note has one more job: it is the only record of why the person came. More on that in first session with a new client.
One honest limit. "Dump everything, cut later" works because the brain dump is working material, not the record. If you are licensed, part of what you write becomes a record, and a record is not freely editable: Washington wants it written "within twenty-four hours of treatment", corrections made "by a single line drawn through the text and initialed so the original entry remains legible", and signed electronic entries that "must not be deleted" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021); Massachusetts uses the same 24-hour window when a written plan is in play (269 CMR 5.03, 2025). So the dump is the input; what you sign as the record is your decision, and your status decides whether you may rewrite it afterwards.
What should stay out of the note?
Anything that reads as a statement about a condition, its cause or its outcome; other people's words about the client; guesses written as facts; and verdicts on the person. Write what you observed and what the client said, and mark your hunches as yours.
This is the one part of the article that does not come from my own notes: the question never arises for me, because no board reads them. For a licensed practitioner in the United States it does, and the ground is the statute. Washington's statutory definition of massage therapy excludes identifying an illness (RCW 18.108.010, 2016); Massachusetts puts naming an illness or disease first among the acts a licensee shall not perform (M.G.L. c. 112, § 228).
Naming a condition yourself is the act those statutes place outside the licence. Noting one a doctor has already named, with its source, is a different act — Massachusetts asks for exactly that when a written plan is in play (269 CMR 5.03, 2025).
Names of conditions. Write what the client said and what you noticed instead. "Client says the lower back has been sore since a long drive; guarding on the left when turning" carries everything you need and claims nothing. If a doctor has already named it, record it as the doctor's, with the source, not as your own conclusion.
Cause and outcome. "The tension was causing the headaches" and "the session fixed the shoulder" are claims you cannot stand behind, and the second is the "outcome measures" language Washington reserves for work "where the focus is on treating a health condition" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021). Instead: "client said the head felt lighter by the end; breath slowed in the last part."
The words that box you in. "Treatment plan" and "findings" are not neutral vocabulary; in Washington they name the extra items required only for condition-focused work (WAC 246-830-565, 2021). Using them in a note about relaxation work puts the note in that box. Write "next time" and "what I noticed".
Third parties. What a partner, a parent or another practitioner said about the client belongs to them, not to your note. Keep to what the client told you and what happened in the room.
Guesses dressed as facts. Hunches stay in — they are half the value of the note — but as hunches. "My sense was that the breath changed when we talked about work; try staying there next time" reads as one. "Stress-related" is a hunch reading as a verdict.
Verdicts on the person. "Difficult", "resistant", "not committed" tell a future reader about your mood, not the client. Write the behaviour: "arrived late again; said mornings are hard right now."
When does a clinical format fit, and when does it not?
When the focus of your work is a health condition. The rule itself draws that line; for relaxation, somatic, energy and coaching work the format is optional and mostly a mismatch.
The line is in the text. Washington's rule reads: "For massage therapy where the focus is on treating a health condition, the following additional information is required: (i) Symptoms, for example, pain, loss of function, and muscle stiffness; (ii) Evaluation and findings, for example, movement, posture, palpation assessment and findings; (iii) Outcome measures, for example, improvement in symptoms, movement, posture, palpation, and function; and (iv) Treatment plan for future sessions" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021). Those four additional items are the clinical apparatus in full: symptoms, findings, outcome measures, plan. Massachusetts has the same architecture — "If a written plan of treatment is requested or required", an initial evaluation, signed progress notes and recommendations go into the file within 24 hours (269 CMR 5.03, 2025).
So "do I need a clinical format?" has an answer in the rule, and it turns on what you are doing, not on who you are. If you work on a named condition with a plan, use the format; if not, the four items ask you to invent content you do not have, and that invented content is what reads as a claim. The word you use for the person draws the same line: see Client or patient?
HIPAA gets one paragraph here. The Department of Health and Human Services puts the boundary in one line, "The HIPAA Rules apply to covered entities and business associates", adding that an entity outside those definitions "does not have to comply with the HIPAA Rules" (HHS, 2024). That is not a blanket "not you": Washington's records rule requires records secured "in compliance with chapter 70.02 RCW and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)" (WAC 246-830-570, 2021). Whether it applies to you is a separate piece; our own position is in the Terms, and it reads:
"HoldSpace is not currently HIPAA-certified. We do not offer Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) at this time. If you are a healthcare provider subject to HIPAA regulations, you must not use HoldSpace to store, process, or transmit Protected Health Information (PHI) as defined under HIPAA. By using the Service, you acknowledge this limitation. If you are unsure whether HIPAA applies to your practice, consult a qualified legal professional."
How do you keep a note like this without it becoming a chore?
Say it, right after, and let the structure come later.
Two ordinary habits do most of the work: start the note before the next thing starts, and let the first pass be rough. Washington's twenty-four-hour window (WAC 246-830-565, 2021) is a ceiling, not a target.
We built the tool we use for it: HoldSpace is practice management for holistic practitioners — voice-first session notes, online booking, and client history in one place, built for people who hold space, not for hospitals. You dictate after a session, the speech becomes text, and structuring writes the organised version as a new version of the note, so the brain dump stays underneath it. Audio is never stored. Screen by screen, it is in the article on how the product works; the plans are in the pricing page.
Start on the free plan30 minutes of voice, 10 structurings and 5 clients.
FAQ
Do massage therapists have to keep notes?
In the two states we read, yes: Washington's rule says a massage therapist "must document services provided" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021), and Massachusetts sets a five-item minimum for relaxation sessions (269 CMR 5.03, 2025). Requirements differ by state, so your own board's rule is the one that counts.
Are massage therapists required to keep SOAP notes?
Not in Washington: "Therapists are not required to do SOAP notes under this rule" (Washington State Department of Health, FAQ, retrieved 2026); the clinical items apply only "where the focus is on treating a health condition" (WAC 246-830-565, 2021).
Do therapists have to keep notes if they do not bill insurance?
Billing does not create the duty. In Washington it stands on the licence and applies "regardless of the practice setting" (Washington State Department of Health, FAQ, retrieved 2026); what changes without billing is the format, not the existence of the note.
How do you write client notes without making medical claims?
Write what you observed and what the client said, and mark hunches as hunches. Names of conditions and statements of cause or outcome stay out — in Washington and Massachusetts they describe work outside the massage licence (RCW 18.108.010, 2016; M.G.L. c. 112, § 228).
Sources
- Washington State Department of Health, Board of Massage (2021). WAC 246-830-565, Recordkeeping. Washington Administrative Code, filed 24 December 2020, effective 1 September 2021. app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=246-830-565
- Washington State Department of Health, Board of Massage (2021). WAC 246-830-570, Client record retention and security. Washington Administrative Code. app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=246-830-570
- Washington State Department of Health (undated). Massage Therapist: new and amended rules, FAQ. The page carries no publication date; it answers amendments that became effective 30 July 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2026. doh.wa.gov/…/massage-therapist/rules-progress/new-and-amended-rules
- Washington State Legislature (2016). RCW 18.108.010, Definitions. Revised Code of Washington, as amended 2016 c 41 § 1. app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=18.108.010
- Washington State Legislature (2017). RCW 18.108.050, Exemptions. Revised Code of Washington, 2017 c 77 § 1. app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=18.108.050
- Massachusetts Board of Registration of Massage Therapy (2025). 269 CMR 5.03, Standards for Documentation, in the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Ethical Practice. Mass. Register No. 1560, 7 November 2025. mass.gov/doc/269-cmr-5-code-of-professional-ethics-and-standards-of-ethical-practice/download
- Massachusetts General Court. Massachusetts General Laws, Part I, Title XVI, Chapter 112, Section 228. Current text, retrieved 3 September 2026. malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXVI/Chapter112/Section228
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (2024). Covered Entities and Business Associates. Content last reviewed 21 August 2024. hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/covered-entities/index.html
- Association of Massage Therapists, Australia (2023). Keeping on top of client records. AMT blog, 28 September 2023. blog.amt.org.au/index.php/2023/09/28/keeping-on-top-of-client-records/
- Canadian Massage & Manual Osteopathic Therapists Association (2025). The Importance of the Client Record. 19 August 2025, updated November 2025. cmmota.com/the-importance-of-the-client-record/
- International Coaching Federation (2026). ICF Code of Ethics, Part 4, Section 2, Standard 2.4. Board approved October 2024, revised February 2026. coachingfederation.org/…/icf-ethics-code-of-ethics.pdf
- International Coaching Federation (2026). Insights and Considerations for Ethics, ICE for Standard 2.4. Revised February 2026. coachingfederation.org/…/icf-ethics-ethical-insights-and-considerations.pdf
- HoldSpace (2026). Terms of Service, section 10, HIPAA Disclaimer. Version 2026-05-01. holdspace.pro/terms
